Awash In Big Bucks For Small Services

 

Halloween Update -- October 31, 2020  

Please take a look at this National Legal and Policy Center news article cited in the associated link.  Donations of $70 million+ from the Chinese Communist Party entities to the University of Pennsylvania (UPENN) and to UPENN's recent invention named the "Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement." Communist Chinese dollars to fund the Biden Center... allegedly part of the "Anonymous" Money Laundering 101 scheme to pay-off Joe Biden? So ask yourself honestly – where did the nearly One Million Dollars to pay Joe Biden's UPENN salary come from? That old Brooklyn Bridge remains for sale for those who think that Biden's UPENN salary funding is not tied to the Chinese ruling party.  

The content link to this National Legal and Policy Center disclosure is now removed; whereas, the original discussion was found at https://nlpc.org/2020/05/21/complaint-filed-against-university-of-pennsylvania-and-biden-center-for-undisclosed-china-mega-donations/

This Post Originally Published On August 31, 2020

Back in 2016, several thousand dollars were sent from accounts at Fidelity Investments to other financial organizations after discovering Fidelity paid Mrs. Clinton over a quarter million $$ for a  2015/2016 Florida public appearance and 90-minute speech to the Fidelity unwashed upper managers.  My question, just what sage financial advice is it that Clinton could or might convey to top professional Fidelity Money Managers?  A complaining message on this was sent to Fidelity's CEO, and a form reply was received back from some middle-level PR functionary that stated this business practice was none of my business.  Well, Fidelity in large part lost one customer... but sadly seems Fidelity continues well without me and other disgusted investors... we the customers.  Welcome to a new college course in under-the-table corrupt business practices... call it Money-Laundering 101.  It is past time to see precisely how doner contributions are divided up among various public and private university accounts and just what percentage of the aggregate donations are paid out in these not-so-obvious (aka "under-the-table") political contributions.     

And finding stuff conveyed in the link below on Joe Biden's grossly over-paid association with the University of Pennsylvania (UPENN) is equally disgusting.  Very surprised to read that "Slow Joe B" (and his buddy Jeb Bush, et al) are similarily big-buck associated with this and other universities like Drew U, Vanderbilt U, etc., etc... don't be surprised if the vast majority of institutions of higher learning do similar unchecked little disclosure on these big-buck political payouts.  So where do these schools of higher learning get those big-$$ spent to buy the "prestige" of politicians like Slow Joe B?  It may surprise some to find that among the distinguished graduate donors to UPENN, for example, is Warren Buffet (a super-rich guy and no friend to Republican/Conservative thought)?  And just how is it that any clear-thinking person can see these large donor contributions to universities as anything short of money-laundering to avoid the legal limits on personal political contributions. 

OBTW, a big-belly laugh: Biden’s official title at UPENN is the Benjamin Franklin Presidential Practice Professor — he the first person to hold that invented job.  🙈

CLICK  Slow Joe Payoffs to view the article.

**** The Biggest Disingenuous Statement ****

OPEN LETTER TO BRET BAIER OF FOX NEWS,  FAKE NEWS OPINION:
The "new" ununited people of the United States.

Watching you (et al) on FOX NEWS, I'm wondering what's up with the frequent drum beat concerning our presently divided country – the nebulous, near constant hand-wringing? Historically, we "Americans" – whether as British colonial subjects, or as USA citizen-residents before the American Civil War, and certainly our post American Civil War brothers and sisters who guided us to present days are a divided people. We are now and always have been a right-center-left politically divided people, and some folks have been and are ready to fight.

Those 1770-era rebels (George Washington, Paul Revere, Daniel Morgan and the bands of insurgents they influenced and commanded) likely represented less than a 30% minority of then North American British colonial general population; whereas, more than 20% of these British colonists – the loyalists and Tories – remained supportive of King George, desiring continued allegiance to their roots and the British Crown. And the loyalist and Tories were treated so well by resident rebels during and following the American Revolution by life, liberty, and personal property seizures.  I guess drawn-quartered-and-hung or tar-and-feathers on loyalist humans is not cruel. Indeed, perhaps a majority of people living on present USA lands had no strong opinion on rebellion or British loyalty. These folks simply wanted to be left alone – to proceed with happiness, liberty, and a better life – concerned more in making an acceptable living and protecting their family and property.

In the immediate post Revolutionary War period, thousands of new rebels called “Shaysites” participated in an armed revolt called Shays' Rebellion, with intentions to overthrow unacceptable government, unfair taxation, and general bad conduct of a fledgling United States federal government. General Washington and other prominent New Englanders were called up to assist in putting down Daniel Shays' Rebellion.  Look it up.

Do this: Execute a Google search on “Whiskey Rebellion” – a significant 1791 armed taxation revolt eventually put down under the leadership of President George Washington.

Why was the first-term presidency of Thomas Jefferson decided in the U.S. House of Representatives? Seems there was a tiny bit of political division between Americans in that year 1800.

And in 1804, the Alexander Hamilton-Aaron Burr political factions were vastly united, were they not? An ongoing “civil conversation” decided by a single pistol shot in an illegal duel – where is this incorrect? A sitting Vice President of the United States Burr accused of murder – nothing to see, not a bit of political division discovered here.

The General Andrew Jackson presidency was certainly a period that marshaled USA political calm and unity. Ha! Native Americans might disagree.

Those years a decade or two before the American Civil War period presented citizens with strongly united leadership – vast unity – right! Then the election of President Lincoln and those many good and happy years in a “united USA” following 1860.  Move on, nothing to see here either.

Correct me:  We the USA people were uniformly united in the several years before and during the two world wars, Korea, Vietnam – and even the seemingly endless conflicts underway today. Please start telling the truth as it really is, and generally has been throughout colonial and U.S. American history. Perhaps the most remarkable USA general population characteristic is rather constant and strong division among our peoples. For crying out loud, confront untrue positions by such whining commentator opinion, the pseudo experts on FOX NEWS (and the unwatchable dishonest major media) who claim present USA political division is somehow an unknown anomaly. Bret, perhaps you would be so kind to pass these truths to some of your more vocal, untruthful, irresponsible, and demonstrably misleading colleagues (that teller of liberal tales Shepard Smith to name just one).

Best regards,

Dave Paul

German Flatts, Herkimer County, NY